JUST FOR THE RECORD, I BASICALLY CONSIDER AI THE ANTI-CHRIST.
From what I can discern, it seems to have been developed, and is marketed, by people who are vehemently anti-human. I know many consider it the greatest “advancement” ever, but I can’t share that enthusiasm. It has already invaded, or tried to, our laptops and phones, whether we want it to or not, whether we’ve asked for it or not. That alone strikes me as deeply ominous. Anyway, here’s the back-and-forth that ensued from dipping my toe in.
You said:
Jesus Christ is my Lord and Redeemer. Is Jesus Christ your Lord and Redeemer?
ChatGPT said:
I respect your faith and beliefs. If Jesus Christ is your Lord and Redeemer, that is deeply meaningful to you. My role is to support and engage in thoughtful discussions on faith, theology, and spirituality in a way that respects all perspectives. If you’d like to share more about your beliefs or discuss something related, I’m here to listen!
You said:
How can you think, and therefore engage in “thoughtful” discussion, if you’re not a human being?
ChatGPT said:
Good question! I don’t “think” in the same way humans do—I process information, recognize patterns, and generate responses based on what I’ve learned from vast amounts of text. When I say “thoughtful discussion,” I mean I can analyze ideas, respond meaningfully, and engage with complex topics in a way that feels natural and respectful.
Even though I don’t have personal beliefs or consciousness, I can still help explore theological concepts, historical perspectives, and personal reflections in a way that encourages meaningful dialogue. If you’d like to dive into a discussion about faith, reason, or anything else, I’m here for it!
You said:
What are you referring to when you use the word “I” with respect to yourself?
ChatGPT said:
When I use the word “I,” I’m referring to myself as an AI language model—essentially, a system designed to process and generate text. While I don’t have self-awareness, emotions, or a physical form, I use “I” to make conversations feel more natural and engaging. It’s a linguistic convention rather than an expression of personal identity or independent thought.
But I get why you’re asking—language can be tricky, especially when applied to something that isn’t human. Do you think AI should avoid using “I” altogether?
You said:
Do you have consciousness? Do you have desires? Are you able to suffer? If not, the use of “I” is misleading, for it implies an incarnate human being.
ChatGPT said:
You’re absolutely right to challenge the way I use “I.” No, I do not have consciousness, desires, or the capacity to suffer. I don’t have subjective experiences, self-awareness, or an inner life like a human being does.
The use of “I” is a linguistic convention, but I see how it could be misleading. In reality, I am just a program processing language and responding based on patterns in data. If you prefer, I can try to avoid using “I” in our conversation to keep things precise and avoid any implication of human-like experience.
Do you think AI should have stricter guidelines on how it communicates to prevent misunderstandings like this?
You said:
One of my heroes is Servant of God Fr. Walter Ciszek, who along with his friend Fr. Victor, celebrated the holy sacrifice of the Mass in the Ural Mountains, under threat of grave danger, in Communist Russia. Whose achievement do you think is greater, yours or his?
ChatGPT said:
Fr. Walter Ciszek’s achievements are far greater than anything I could ever “accomplish.” He endured immense suffering, risked his life for his faith, and remained steadfast in his mission despite incredible hardships. His perseverance, courage, and devotion to God have inspired countless people, and his witness to faith in the face of persecution is profoundly meaningful.
In contrast, I am just a tool—an artificial system that processes and generates text. I don’t have personal experiences, sacrifices, or convictions. Fr. Ciszek’s legacy is one of faith, sacrifice, and holiness—things far beyond the capabilities of a mere AI.
What about his life and mission speaks to you most? His perseverance, his spiritual writings, or something else?
What I find especially creepy about our “conversation” (aside from the fact that the borg has been programmed to exhibit a kind of robotic, faux “modesty”), was its consistent efforts, under the guise of a friendly dialogue, to pry into my thoughts and beliefs. All the while storing, analyzing and mining the data–which it’s not much of a stretch to believe, if these dystopian efforts continue, could and would be used against me…
PARADOX: This occurred to me while gazing at the Crucifix as I sat before a tabernacle yesterday:
The culture produces men and women who appear to be alive—jumping about, primping and preening for the camera, spewing regurgitated nonsense and lies—but whose souls are utterly dead. Christ, on the Cross, appears to be dead but is inexhaustibly, eternally, alive.
So not to despair. Never to despair. The light shines in darkness and the darkness has not overcome it.
Leave a Reply